Center for Teaching the Rule of Law

June 22, 1633 – The Holy Office in Rome forces Galileo Galilei to recant his view that the Sun, not the Earth, is the center of the Universe in the form he presented it in, after heated controversy.

6/22/2021

0 Comments

 
PictureGalileo before the Holy Office, a 19th-century painting by Joseph-Nicolas Robert-Fleury
The Galileo affair began around 1610 and culminated with the trial and condemnation of Galileo Galilei by the Roman Catholic Inquisition in 1633. Galileo was prosecuted for his support of heliocentrism, the astronomical model in which the Earth and planets revolve around the Sun at the center of the Solar System (which, at the time, was also considered the center of the universe).

In 1610, Galileo published his Sidereus Nuncius (Starry Messenger), describing the surprising observations that he had made with the new telescope, among them, the Galilean moons of Jupiter. With these observations and additional observations that followed, such as the phases of Venus, he promoted the heliocentric theory of Nicolaus Copernicus published in De revolutionibus orbium coelestium in 1543. Galileo's discoveries were met with opposition within the Catholic Church, and in 1616 the Inquisition declared heliocentrism to be "formally heretical." Heliocentric books were banned and Galileo was ordered to abstain from holding, teaching or defending heliocentric ideas.

Galileo went on to propose a theory of tides in 1616, and of comets in 1619; he argued that the tides were evidence for the motion of the Earth. In 1632 Galileo published his Dialogue Concerning the Two Chief World Systems, which implicitly defended heliocentrism, and was immensely popular. Responding to mounting controversy over theology, astronomy and philosophy, the Roman Inquisition tried Galileo in 1633 and found him "vehemently suspect of heresy", sentencing him to indefinite imprisonment. Galileo was kept under house arrest until his death in 1642.

In 1758 the Catholic Church dropped the general prohibition of books advocating heliocentrism from the Index of Forbidden Books. It did not, however, explicitly rescind the decisions issued by the Inquisition in its judgement of 1633 against Galileo, or lift the prohibition of uncensored versions of Copernicus's De Revolutionibus or Galileo's Dialogue. The issue finally came to a head in 1820 when the Master of the Sacred Palace (the Church's chief censor), Filippo Anfossi, refused to license a book by a Catholic canon, Giuseppe Settele, because it openly treated heliocentrism as a physical fact. Settele appealed to pope Pius VII. After the matter had been reconsidered by the Congregation of the Index and the Holy Office, Anfossi's decision was overturned. Copernicus's De Revolutionibus and Galileo's Dialogue were then subsequently omitted from the next edition of the Index when it appeared in 1835.

​Despite this apparent acquiescence of the Church, however, the controversy has never been officially put to rest.  Although Pope John Paul II expressed a desire to see the matter concluded favorably to Galileo and created a Pontifical Interdisciplinary Study Commission in 1981 to study the case, the Commission was not able to reach any definitive result because of the continuing insistence of conservative theologians that Galileo, despite being scientifically accurate, was nonetheless guilty of heresy for challenge the Church's established law.

As recently as 2008, Pope Benedict XVI was forced to cancel a planned visit to La Sapienza University because a majority of the faculty and students protested against Benedict's statement, prior to his election as Pope, that "[t]he Church at the time of Galileo kept much more closely to reason than did Galileo himself, and she took into consideration the ethical and social consequences of Galileo's teaching too. Her verdict against Galileo was rational and just, and the revision of this verdict can be justified only on the grounds of what is politically opportune."  The official letter of protest stated that they views of the Pope and others in the Church "offend and humiliate us as scientists who are loyal to reason and as teachers who have dedicated our lives to the advance and dissemination of knowledge."

0 Comments

May 24, 1626 – Peter Minuit "buys" Manhattan.

5/24/2021

0 Comments

 
PicturePeter Minuit (Public Domain)
Minuit is credited with purchasing the island of Manhattan from the Native Americans in exchange for traded goods valued at 60 guilders. According to the writer Nathaniel Benchley, Minuit conducted the transaction with Seyseys, chief of the Canarsees, who were only too happy to accept valuable merchandise in exchange for an island that was mostly controlled by the Weckquaesgeeks.

According to researchers at the National Library of the Netherlands, "The original inhabitants of the area were unfamiliar with the European notions and definitions of ownership rights. For the Indians, water, air and land could not be traded. Such exchanges would also be difficult in practical terms because many groups migrated between their summer and winter quarters. It can be concluded that both parties probably went home with totally different interpretations of the sales agreement."

A contemporary purchase of rights in nearby Staten Island, to which Minuit also was party, involved duffel cloth, iron kettles, axe heads, hoes, wampum, drilling awls, "Jew's harps", and "diverse other wares". "If similar trade goods were involved in the Manhattan arrangement", Burrows and Wallace surmise, "then the Dutch were engaged in high-end technology transfer, handing over equipment of enormous usefulness in tasks ranging from clearing land to drilling wampum."

Minuit conducted politics in a measure of democracy in the colony during his time in New Netherland. He was highest judge in the colony, but in both civil and criminal affairs he was assisted by a council of five colonists. This advisory body would advise the director and jointly with him would develop, administer, and adjudicate a body of laws to help govern the colony. In addition there was a schout-fiscal, half-sheriff, half-attorney-general, and the customs officer.


0 Comments

May 20, 1775 -- The Mecklenburg Declaration of Independence Was Signed (Maybe)

5/20/2021

1 Comment

 
​The Mecklenburg Declaration of Independence is a text published in 1819 with the claim that it was the first declaration of independence made in the Thirteen Colonies during the American Revolution. It was supposedly signed on May 20, 1775, in Charlotte, North Carolina, by a committee of citizens of Mecklenburg County, who declared independence from Great Britain after hearing of the battle of Lexington. If the story is true, the Mecklenburg Declaration preceded the United States Declaration of Independence by more than a year. The authenticity of the Mecklenburg Declaration has been disputed since it was published, forty-four years after it was reputedly written. There is no verifiable evidence to confirm the original document's existence and no reference to it has been found in extant newspapers from 1775.

Professional historians have maintained that the Mecklenburg Declaration of Independence is an inaccurate rendering of an authentic document known as the Mecklenburg Resolves. The Resolves, a set of radical resolutions passed on May 31, 1775, fell short of an actual declaration of independence. Although published in newspapers in 1775, the text of the Mecklenburg Resolves was lost after the American Revolution and not rediscovered until 1838. 

​The early government of North Carolina, convinced that the Mecklenburg Declaration was genuine, maintained that North Carolinians were the first Americans to declare independence from Great Britain. As a result, both the seal and the flag of North Carolina bear the date of the declaration. A holiday commemorating the Mecklenburg Declaration, "Meck Dec Day," is celebrated on May 20 in North Carolina, although it is no longer an official holiday and does not attract the attention that it once did.

1 Comment

May 18, 1631 -- John Winthrop becomes the "first" Governor of Massachusetts

5/18/2021

1 Comment

 
Picture
Portrait of Massachusetts Bay Colony Governor John Winthrop. It was held in the Winthrop family until the 19th century, when it was donated to the American Antiquarian Society. (Public Domain)

History is more than a collection of names and dates, but at least as to names and dates, it tends to be accurate, right?  Well, maybe not.

John Winthrop (January 12, 1587/88– March 26, 1649) was an English Puritan lawyer and one of the leading figures in founding the Massachusetts Bay Colony, the second major settlement in New England following Plymouth Colony.  Winthrop led the first large wave of colonists from England in 1630

and served as governor for 12 of the colony's first 20 years. His writings and vision of the colony as a Puritan "city upon a hill" dominated New England colonial development, influencing the governments and religions of neighboring colonies.  He is also generally identified as the first Governor of the Massachusetts Bay Colony.  But was he?

When Winthrop arrived in the colony, another man, John Endecott, had already been appointed as Governor.  But Endicott was not the sole Governor.  Instead, he was the "Governor in the Colony," while another many, Matthew Craddock was the "Governor in the Company" in London.  Due to a political crisis in England which caused King Charles I to dissolve Parliament, Craddock proposed that the split governorship be transferred to the Colony under a single office.  Craddock did not want to emigrate, and Winthrop was chosen from among three candidates. 

Thus, Winthrop was the "first" Governor who did not share the office.  Both Winthrop and Endecott served many additional terms as Governor.
1 Comment

May 14, 1607 -- Construction of James Fort

5/14/2021

0 Comments

 
PictureColonial Jamestown About 1614 (public domain)
On May 14, 1607, English colonists establish "James Fort," which would become Jamestown, Virginia, the earliest permanent English settlement in the Americas.  Under the "Old Style" reckoning the date was recorded as May 4.  Contrary to what most American's "know" however, Jamestown was not the first European settlement in the New World.  That honor arguably goes to Isabella on the island of Hispaniola in 1493, though a better claim probably can be made for Santo Domingo, also on Hispaniola in 1496.  Nor was Jamestown the first European settlement on the North American mainland, as that honor goes to Villa Rica de la Veracruz, founded by Hernán Cortés in 1519.  Jamestown was not even the first European settlement in what is today the United States, as St. Augustine, Florida in 1565 (and even before that there were other attempts to establish colonies by the Spanish in what is now South Carolina).  The French Huguenots had established settlements on Florida before 1600 and one in New France (modern Canada) in 1604.  And while the ill-fated Roanoke colonies of 1585 and 1587 did result in a permanent settlement, we know now through DNA evidence that some of the colonists did survive and intermarried with indigenous people.  so Jamestown, for all its fame, was more of a Johnny-come-lately.

0 Comments

May 7, 1992 – Michigan ratifies a 203-year-old proposed amendment to the United States Constitution making the 27th Amendment law. This amendment bars the U.S. Congress from giving itself a mid-term pay raise.

5/7/2021

0 Comments

 

The Twenty-seventh Amendment (Amendment XXVII) to the United States Constitution prohibits any law that increases or decreases the salary of members of Congress from taking effect until the start of representatives' next set of terms of office. It is the most recently adopted amendment but was one of the first proposed.

The 1st Congress submitted the amendment to the states for ratification on September 25, 1789, along with 11 other proposed amendments (Articles I–XII). The last ten Articles were ratified in 1791 to become the Bill of Rights, but the first two, the Twenty-seventh Amendment and the proposed Congressional Apportionment Amendment, were not ratified by enough states to come into force with them.

Picture

​The proposed congressional pay amendment was largely forgotten until 1982, when Gregory Watson, a 19-year-old sophomore at the University of Texas at Austin, wrote a paper for a government class in which he claimed that the amendment could still be ratified. An unconvinced teaching assistant graded the paper poorly, motivating Watson to launch a nationwide campaign to complete its ratification.

Initially, the process was slow, but as more states voted to ratify, the movement gained national attention leading to apparently Michigan being the 39th state to ratify on May 7, 1992.  Although the amendment was subsequently certified on May  19, 1992 and published in the Congressional Record with both housing of Congress voting the following day to accept the amendment as ratified by the requisite 2/3's majority of the states, it was subsequently discovered that Kentucky, which was initially recorded as not having ratified the amendment until March 21, 1996, had actually ratified on June 27, 1792 following admission to the Union.  Thus, the 27th Amendment was legally ratified on May 5, 1992, when Missouri and Alabama had both ratified.  

Image: Gregory Watson in 2017.  Watson originally received a C- on his paper, which was subsequently changed to an A in 2017 in recognition of his achievement in having the Amendment ratified.

0 Comments

April 28, 1789 -- Fletcher Christian Leads the Mutineers of the HMS Bounty

4/28/2021

0 Comments

 
Picture
Fletcher Christian and the mutineers sent Lieutenant William Bligh and 18 others adrift; 1790 painting by Robert Dodd.
The mutiny on the Royal Navy vessel HMS Bounty occurred in the South Pacific Ocean on 28 April 1789. Disaffected crewmen, led by acting-Lieutenant Fletcher Christian, seized control of the ship from their captain, Lieutenant William Bligh, and set him and 18 loyalists adrift in the ship's open launch. The mutineers variously settled on Tahiti or on Pitcairn Island. Bligh navigated more than 3,500 nautical miles (6,500 km; 4,000 mi) in the launch to reach safety, and began the process of bringing the mutineers to justice. In October 1790, Bligh was honorably acquitted at the court-martial inquiring into the loss of Bounty.   He eventual rose to the rank of Vice Admiral of the Blue Squadron.

Though often portrayed as a tyrant who drive his crew to mutiny, a reexamination of Bligh's manner of command arguably suggests that far from being to hard on his crew, he was too lenient and failed to curd their excesses during the many months that they were in Tahiti.  One example of his failure to exercise some modicum of control related to the use of ships nails as barter items.  The iron nails were much prized by the native, who could fashion them into many different utensils, but were also necessary for keeping the ship in repair.  Eventually, the crew pilfered all of the fresh nails, and even began prying nails from the Bounty's woodwork to trade for food, drink, and female companionship.  

After Bligh reached England in April 1790, the Admiralty dispatched HMS Pandora to apprehend the mutineers. Fourteen were captured in Tahiti and imprisoned on board Pandora, which then searched without success for Christian's party that had hidden on Pitcairn Island. After turning back towards England, Pandora ran aground on the Great Barrier Reef, with the loss of 31 crew and four prisoners from Bounty. The 10 surviving detainees reached England in June 1792 and were court martialed; four were acquitted, three were pardoned and three were hanged.

Christian's group remained undiscovered on Pitcairn until 1808, by which time only one mutineer, John Adams, remained alive. Almost all of his fellow mutineers, including Christian, had been killed, either by each other or by their Polynesian companions. No action was taken against Adams; descendants of the mutineers and their Tahitian captives live on Pitcairn into the 21st century.

Bligh's logbooks documenting the mutiny were officially inscribed on the 
UNESCO Australian Memory of the World register on 26 February 2021
0 Comments
Forward>>

    CTROL Blog

    This blog will be used by Center Staff to post articles addressing issues concerning the Rule of Law and how it is taught and understood in our communities, nation, and world.

    Categories

    All
    American Revolution
    Capital Punishment
    Civil Disobedience
    Civil Law
    Civil Rights Movement
    Colonialism
    Criminal Law
    Death Penalty
    Economic Equltiy
    Economics
    Editorials
    Educators
    Fractured History
    Freedom Of Religion
    Freedom Of Speech
    Gender Equality
    Government
    Historical Sources For The Rule Of Law
    Immigration
    Indigenous People
    International
    Jim Crow
    Labor
    Laws
    Literature
    Miscarriage Of Justice
    Nativism
    Property Rights
    Race Relations
    Riots
    Slavery
    Taxation
    The Holocaust
    Today In The History Of The Rule Of Law
    Trials
    United States Supreme Court
    US Constitution
    Vigilantism
    Voting Rights
    Women Of Note
    World War II

    RSS Feed

About

Vision
Rule of Law Project
Rule of Law Blog
​Site Map
Navigation Help

Offerings

Educator Resources
Student Resources
Attorney Engagement
Community Engagement

Contact and Support CTROL

Contact
Support
Privacy Policy
​Contact the Webmaster
© COPYRIGHT 2009-2021. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.